I disagree. The west may make up less of an overall share, but they still make way more per capita emissions. While i agree with throwing away any over politicised framework, i think that is not the case here and the west genuinely needs to do more
My concern is with the broader strategy. Closing one faucet out of three won’t hurt, but it’s not a realistic strategy if your goal is to prevent the tub from overflowing.
It's true that current emissions are more attributable to the developing world, but let's not forget that the developed world has been contributing its emissions for more than a century. Add to that the greater ability of the developed world to control its emissions, and it becomes clear that we have a very great obligation to work for the mitigation of this problem.
This is so true. I wrote an article making a similar argument:
https://frompovertytoprogress.substack.com/p/why-greens-should-stop-focusing-on
I disagree. The west may make up less of an overall share, but they still make way more per capita emissions. While i agree with throwing away any over politicised framework, i think that is not the case here and the west genuinely needs to do more
My concern is with the broader strategy. Closing one faucet out of three won’t hurt, but it’s not a realistic strategy if your goal is to prevent the tub from overflowing.
The climate does not care about per capita emissions. It is only total emissions that effect the climate.
What is the source of the emissions chart you linked to?
I downloaded the EU’s Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research and made it
It's true that current emissions are more attributable to the developing world, but let's not forget that the developed world has been contributing its emissions for more than a century. Add to that the greater ability of the developed world to control its emissions, and it becomes clear that we have a very great obligation to work for the mitigation of this problem.
Sure. It’s just unwise to confuse that for a strategy. It isn’t.