Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mary Beth Fielder's avatar

This is an interesting and urgent perspective, but it oversimplifies some key challenges. Ocean fertilization may be a viable carbon removal strategy, but it’s far from a risk-free “only game in town.” Large-scale interventions could disrupt marine ecosystems, trigger dead zones, or result in carbon quickly re-released into the atmosphere. Past experiments have shown mixed results, and international regulations exist for a reason.

Dismissing emissions reduction as too slow is also misleading—removing carbon while continuing to emit at current rates is like bailing out a sinking ship without plugging the hole. A diverse approach combining emissions cuts, ocean and land-based CDR, and responsible climate interventions is far more realistic than betting everything on one high-risk method. Urgency is crucial, but so is scientific caution.

Expand full comment
Steven's avatar

Congrats on your new job! Good luck with all that work, it sounds like you have that sweet spot of 'productive, but rewarding' to dig into. Whenever it's ready, I wish you all the best in getting whatever government buy-in you'll need.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts